Mens Aid NI

Mens Aid NI

Thursday, 17 March 2011

Fwd: [E4F_International nr.11796] Saving the men who live in fear of domestic violence (UK)



Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Greg Andresen <mens.issues@gmail.com>
Date: 18 March 2011 00:01:14 GMT
To: Greg Andresen <mens.issues@gmail.com>
Subject: [E4F_International nr.11796] Saving the men who live in fear of domestic violence (UK)
Reply-To: equality-4-fathers-international@googlegroups.com

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/03/17/saving-the-men-who-live-in-fear-115875-22994518/

Saving the men who live in fear of domestic violence (UK)

by Louise Baty, Daily Mirror 17/03/2011

We're all familiar with the terrifying ordeals of battered wives, beaten, abused and humiliated in their own homes. But what happens when the situation is turned on its head?

More than 40% of domestic violence victims are male, yet they often ­struggle to find support and feel ashamed to look for help. But there is hope, thanks to the UK's growing number of refuges exclusive to men.

Safe house Kendal Lodge, a terraced house in Powys, Mid Wales, which was the first to open in 2006, has provided a home for more than 50 battered men over the years and children, too.

Men are housed in one of three bedrooms – named Faith, Hope and Charity – and given bedding, clothes and toiletries, while children get toys to help them settle in.

Each resident has his own room while bathrooms, kitchen and living room are shared.

Workers at Montgomery Family Crisis Centre, which has run women's refuges for decades, realised there was a need for men-only centres 10 years ago when a man with head injuries turned up at their office.

"He'd had his teeth knocked out by his wife that morning and didn't know where else to go," recalls operations manager, Jane Stephenson. "There was a child involved but there was nothing that we could do for him at the women's refuge.

"One of the volunteers offered him her spare room until he got back on his feet. But the incident prompted senior workers to take action.

"If a woman and her children needed a place of safety they would be found one. If a man and his kids were in need of a place they would have to go through the homeless system. If a person needs a place of safety, they should have one, regardless of gender," says Jane.

Geoff, 22, has been staying at the refuge since last November. His ex-girlfriend became violent after suffering from depression.

"She'd swear and throw plates at me in front of our young son," he says. "If I argued back, she'd push me and punch me. She was never violent towards our son but it used to terrify him when she attacked me. He'd run into his bedroom to hide."

Geoff struggled to accept the situation.

"I'd grown up seeing my mum in a violent relationship so I knew that what was happening to me was wrong," he says.

"But I felt too embarrassed to tell any of my friends or relatives. I didn't know where to go for advice. "

The violence continued for three years, until Geoff's mum noticed a bruise on his cheek. "At first, I pretended I'd been in a fight with another bloke because I didn't want to admit that my partner had done it. But eventually, I broke down and told my mum everything," he says. With his mum's support, Geoff contacted Montgomery Family Crisis Centre after finding information about Kendal Lodge online. It turned out that some of the workers remembered him as a child when his mum had been helped by the organisation years earlier.

Now Geoff is having counselling at the refuge to help him come to terms with his ordeal. He never brought criminal charges against his ex and has no contact with his son. He says more needs to be done to help men in violent situations.

"It can be a struggle to be taken seriously because so many still believe that women can't abuse men," he says.

Montgomery Family Crisis Centre's managing director Shirley Powell agrees that people find it difficult to accept men as victims. "It's almost as though the men have to prove that they are abuse victims, in a way that we never expect women to have to do," she says.

Steve, 37, from Essex, is another who suffered in silence for four years at the hands of his controlling girlfriend.

"She encouraged me to cut my friends and family out of my life and would moan if I went out," he says.

"She'd disappear off to the pub and come back drunk. That's when she'd cause trouble, calling me names and telling me that I was useless. Then she started hitting me. Once I woke up in bed and she was leaning over me, punching me in the face."

Steve was ready to leave his girlfriend but when she announced she was pregnant, he gave her another chance.

"During her pregnancy, she didn't touch a drop of alcohol," he says. "She was gentle and loving and I believed that we had a future." But within weeks of giving birth, she was drinking again.

"She'd come home and punch and head butt me," he says. "She even threatened me with kitchen knives. I was terrified of her but, by now, she'd spent all my savings and I was living in her house, so I had nowhere to go. I felt totally alone."

Steve never retaliated. "It's not in my nature. Before meeting her, I hadn't had a relationship for seven years. I was vulnerable and lonely and she used it."

Eventually, Steve tried to leave with his baby daughter, but when he went to social services to ask for help he hit a brick wall.

"The social worker looked at me as though I was making it up," he says. "If a woman had walked in there with a black eye, she would have been helped immediately. But they took one look at me – 6ft 4in and 16st – and thought that I was lying. I walked out of those offices feeling like the world was against me."

Steve was forced to return home, but his partner was finally arrested for assault and he seized his chance.

This time, social services referred him to Montgomery Family Crisis Centre, which gave him refuge at Kendal Lodge. They stayed for six months.

"We were sharing the house with a man who had two kids," recalls Steve. "We'd chat in the kitchen once they'd gone to bed. It was reassuring to speak to someone who understood."

Steve received counselling, help finding accommodation and support when it came to fighting for full custody of his daughter.

"I was so grateful to them for being there to fight my corner," he says.

Steve's partner was found guilty of assault and he is now happily settled with his daughter in another area.

But Steve was one of the lucky ones. While there are more than 7,000 refuge places for women in Britain, there are only around 20 for men with children.

Even then, many male victims choose not to take them up as it would mean moving a long way from their families. Mark Brooks of charity Mankind says the situation for many is still dire.

"There is gradual improvement in services for male victims but progress is far too slow," he says.

"We regularly receive calls from men who are forced to sleep in their cars or suffer in silence at home because they have nowhere to go and they fear no one will believe them."

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Equality 4 Fathers International" group.
To post to this group, send email to Equality-4-Fathers-International@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to Equality-4-Fathers-International-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Equality-4-Fathers-International

Tuesday, 15 March 2011

Fwd: [E4F_International nr.11793] The Father Factor: Data on the Consequences of Father Absence (USA)



Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Greg Andresen <mens.issues@gmail.com>
Date: 15 March 2011 05:53:44 GMT
To: Greg Andresen <mens.issues@gmail.com>
Subject: [E4F_International nr.11793] The Father Factor: Data on the Consequences of Father Absence (USA)
Reply-To: equality-4-fathers-international@googlegroups.com

http://www.fatherhood.org/Page.aspx?pid=403

The Father Factor: Data on the Consequences of Father Absence

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 24 million children in America -- one out of three -- live in biological father-absent homes.

Consequently, there is a "father factor" in nearly all of the social issues facing America today.

Scroll down to view data on the effects of father absence on: poverty, maternal and child health, incarceration, crime, teen pregnancy, child abuse, drug and alcohol abuse, education, and childhood obesity.

Father Factor in Poverty

Children in father-absent homes are five times more likely to be poor. In 2002, 7.8 percent of children in married-couple families were living in poverty, compared to 38.4 percent of children in female-householder families.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Children's Living Arrangements and Characteristics: March 2002, P200-547, Table C8. Washington D.C.: GPO, 2003.

During the year before their babies were born, 43% of unmarried mothers received welfare or food stamps, 21% received some type of housing subsidy, and 9% received another type of government transfer (unemployment insurance etc.). For women who have another child, the proportion who receive welfare or food stamps rises to 54%.
Source: McLanahan, Sara. The Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study: Baseline National Report. Princeton, NJ: Center for Research on Child Well-being, 2003: 13.

A child with a nonresident father is 54 percent more likely to be poorer than his or her father.
Source: Sorenson, Elaine and Chava Zibman. "Getting to Know Poor Fathers Who Do Not Pay Child Support." Social Service Review 75 (September 2001): 420-434.

When compared by family structure, 45.9% of poor single-parent families reported material hardship compared to 38.6% of poor two parent families. For unpoor families who did not experience material hardship, 23.3% were single-parent families compared to 41.2% of two-parent families.
Source: Beverly, Sondra G., "Material hardship in the United States: Evidence from the Survey of Income and Program Participation." Social Work Research 25 (September 2001): 143-151.3

Father Factor in Maternal and Infant Health

Infant mortality rates are 1.8 times higher for infants of unmarried mothers than for married mothers.
Source: Matthews, T.J., Sally C. Curtin, and Marian F. MacDorman. Infant Mortality Statistics from the 1998 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set. National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 48, No. 12. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2000.

Based on birth and death data for 217,798 children born in Georgia in 1989 and 1990, infants without a father's name on their birth certificate (17.9 percent of the total) were 2.3 times more likely to die in the first year of life compared to infants with a father's name on their birth certificate.
Source: Gaudino, Jr., James A., Bill Jenkins, and Foger W. Rochat. "No Fathers' Names: A Risk Factor for Infant Mortality in the State of Georgia, USA." Social Science and Medicine 48 (1999): 253-265. 

Unmarried mothers are less likely to obtain prenatal care and more likely to have a low birth-weight baby. Researchers find that these negative effects persist even when they take into account factors, such as parental education, that often distinguish single-parent from two-parent families.
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Report to Congress on Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing. Hyattsville, MD (Sept. 1995): 12.

Expectant fathers can play a powerful role as advocates of breastfeeding to their wives. Three-fourths of women whose partners attended a breastfeeding promotion class initiated breastfeeding.
Source: Wolfberg, Adam J., et al. "Dads as breastfeeding advocates: results from a randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 191 (September 2004): 708-712.

Fathers' knowledge about breastfeeding increases the likelihood that a child will be breastfed. Children who fathers knew more had a 1.76 higher chance of being breastfed at the end of the first month and 1.91 higher chance of receiving maternal milk at the end of the third month.
Source: Susin, Lurie R.O. "Does Parental Breastfeeding Knowledge Increase Breastfeeding Rates?" BIRTH 26 (September 1999): 149-155.

Twenty-three percent of unmarried mothers in large U.S. cities reported cigarette use during their pregnancy. Seventy-one percent were on Medicare.
Source: McLanahan, Sara. The Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study: Baseline National Report. Table 7. Princeton, NJ: Center for Research on Child Well-being, 2003: 16.

A study of 2,921 mothers revealed that single mothers were twice as likely as married mothers to experience a bout of depression in the prior year. Single mothers also reported higher levels of stress, fewer contacts with family and friends, less involvement with church or social groups and less overall social support.
Source: Cairney, John and Michael Boyle et al. "Stress, Social Support and Depression in Single and Married Mothers." Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 38 (August 2003): 442-449.

In a longitudinal study of more than 10,000 families, researchers found that toddlers living in stepfamilies and single-parent families were more likely to suffer a burn, have a bad fall, or be scarred from an accident compared to kids living with both of their biological parents.
Source: O'Connor, T., L. Davies, J. Dunn, J. Golding, ALSPAC Study Team. "Differential Distribution of Children's Accidents, Injuries and Illnesses across Family Type." Pediatrics 106 (November 2000): e68.

A study of 3,400 middle schoolers indicated that not living with both biological parents quadruples the risk of having an affective disorder.
Source: Cuffe, Steven P., Robert E. McKeown, Cheryl L. Addy, and Carol Z. Garrison. "Family Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Longitudinal Epidemiological Study of Adolescents." Journal of American Academic Child Adolescent Psychiatry 44 (February 2005): 121-129.

Children who live apart from their fathers are more likely to be diagnosed with asthma and experience an asthma-related emergency even after taking into account demographic and socioeconomic conditions. Unmarried, cohabiting parents and unmarried parents living apart are 1.76 and 2.61 times, respectively, more likely to have their child diagnosed with asthma. Marital disruption after birth is associated with a 6-fold increase in the likelihood a children will require an emergency room visit and 5-fold increase of an asthma-related emergency.
Source: Harknett, Kristin. Children's Elevated Risk of Asthma in Unmarried Families: Underlying Structural and Behavioral Mechanisms. Working Paper #2005-01-FF. Princeton, NJ: Center for Research on Child Well-being, 2005: 19-27.

Father Factor in Incarceration

Even after controlling for income, youths in father-absent households still had significantly higher odds of incarceration than those in mother-father families. Youths who never had a father in the household experienced the highest odds.
Source: Harper, Cynthia C. and Sara S. McLanahan. "Father Absence and Youth Incarceration." Journal of Research on Adolescence 14 (September 2004): 369-397.

A 2002 Department of Justice survey of 7,000 inmates revealed that 39% of jail inmates lived in mother-only households. Approximately forty-six percent of jail inmates in 2002 had a previously incarcerated family member. One-fifth experienced a father in prison or jail.
Source: James, Doris J. Profile of Jail Inmates, 2002. (NCJ 201932). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, July 2004.

Father Factor in Crime

A study of 109 juvenile offenders indicated that family structure significantly predicts delinquency.
Source: Bush, Connee, Ronald L. Mullis, and Ann K. Mullis. "Differences in Empathy Between Offender and Nonoffender Youth." Journal of Youth and Adolescence 29 (August 2000): 467-478.

Adolescents, particularly boys, in single-parent families were at higher risk of status, property and person delinquencies. Moreover, students attending schools with a high proportion of children of single parents are also at risk.
Source: Anderson, Amy L. "Individual and contextual influences on delinquency: the role of the single-parent family." Journal of Criminal Justice 30 (November 2002): 575-587.

A study of 13,986 women in prison showed that more than half grew up without their father. Forty-two percent grew up in a single-mother household and sixteen percent lived with neither parent. (Fathers and Daughters)
Source: Snell, Tracy L and Danielle C. Morton. Women in Prison: Survey of Prison Inmates, 1991. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, 1994: 4.

Even after controlling for community context, there is significantly more drug use among children who do not live with their mother and father.
Source: Hoffmann, John P. "The Community Context of Family Structure and Adolescent Drug Use." Journal of Marriage and Family 64 (May 2002): 314-330.

Youths are more at risk of first substance use without a highly involved father. Each unit increase in father involvement is associated with 1% reduction in substance use. Living in an intact family also decreases the risk of first substance use.
Source: Bronte-Tinkew, Jacinta, Kristin A. Moore, Randolph C. Capps, and Jonathan Zaff. "The influence of father involvement on youth risk behaviors among adolescents: A comparison of native-born and immigrant families." Article in Press. Social Science Research December 2004.

Of the 228 students studied, those from single-parent families reported higher rates of drinking and smoking as well as higher scores on delinquency and aggression tests when compared to boys from two-parent households.
Source: Griffin, Kenneth W., Gilbert J. Botvin, Lawrence M. Scheier, Tracy Diaz and Nicole L. Miller. "Parenting Practices as Predictors of Substance Use, Delinquency, and Aggression Among Urban Minority Youth: Moderating Effects of Family Structure and Gender." Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 14 (June 2000): 174-184.

In a study of INTERPOL crime statistics of 39 countries, it was found that single parenthood ratios were strongly correlated with violent crimes. This was not true 18 years ago.
Source: Barber, Nigel. "Single Parenthood As a Predictor of Cross-National Variation in Violent Crime." Cross-Cultural Research 38 (November 2004): 343-358.

Father Factor in Teen Pregnancy

Being raised by a single mother raises the risk of teen pregnancy, marrying with less than a high school degree, and forming a marriage where both partners have less than a high school degree.
Source: Teachman, Jay D. "The Childhood Living Arrangements of Children and the Characteristics of Their Marriages." Journal of Family Issues 25 (January 2004): 86-111.

Separation or frequent changes increase a woman's risk of early menarche, sexual activity and pregnancy. Women whose parents separated between birth and six years old experienced twice the risk of early menstruation, more than four times the risk of early sexual intercourse, and two and a half times higher risk of early pregnancy when compared to women in intact families. The longer a woman lived with both parents, the lower her risk of early reproductive development. Women who experienced three or more changes in her family environment exhibited similar risks but were five times more likely to have an early pregnancy.
Source: Quinlan, Robert J. "Father absence, parental care, and female reproductive development." Evolution and Human Behavior 24 (November 2003): 376-390.

Researchers using a pool from both the U.S. and New Zealand found strong evidence that father absence has an effect on early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy. Teens without fathers were twice as likely to be involved in early sexual activity and seven times more likely to get pregnant as an adolescent.
Source: Ellis, Bruce J., John E. Bates, Kenneth A. Dodge, David M. Ferguson, L. John Horwood, Gregory S. Pettit, and Lianne Woodward. "Does Father Absence Place Daughters at Special Risk for Early Sexual Activity and Teenage Pregnancy." Child Development 74 (May/June 2003): 801-821.

Father Factor in Child Abuse

Compared to living with both parents, living in a single-parent home doubles the risk that a child will suffer physical, emotional, or educational neglect.
Source: America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being. Table SPECIAL1. Washington, D.C.: Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics, 1997.

The overall rate of child abuse and neglect in single-parent households is 27.3 children per 1,000, whereas the rate of overall maltreatment in two-parent households is 15.5 per 1,000.
Source: America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being. Table SPECIAL1. Washington, D.C.: Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics, 1997.

An analysis of child abuse cases in a nationally representative sample of 42 counties found that children from single-parent families are more likely to be victims of physical and sexual abuse than children who live with both biological parents. Compared to their peers living with both parents, children in single parent homes had: 
a 77% greater risk of being physically abused
an 87% greater risk of being harmed by physical neglect
a 165% greater risk of experiencing notable physical neglect
a 74% greater risk of suffering from emotional neglect
an 80% greater risk of suffering serious injury as a result of abuse
overall, a 120% greater risk of being endangered by some type of child abuse.
Source: Sedlak, Andrea J. and Diane D. Broadhurst. The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect: Final Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect. Washington, D.C., September 1996.

Father Factor in Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Researchers at Columbia University found that children living in two-parent household with a poor relationship with their father are 68% more likely to smoke, drink, or use drugs compared to all teens in two-parent households. Teens in single mother households are at a 30% higher risk than those in two-parent households.
Source: "Survey Links Teen Drug Use, Relationship With Father." Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly 6 September 1999: 5.

Even after controlling for community context, there is significantly more drug use among children who do not live with their mother and father.
Source: Hoffmann, John P. "The Community Context of Family Structure and Adolescent Drug Use." Journal of Marriage and Family 64 (May 2002): 314-330.

In a study of 6,500 children from the ADDHEALTH database, father closeness was negatively correlated with the number of a child's friends who smoke, drink, and smoke marijuana. Closeness was also correlated with a child's use of alcohol, cigarettes, and hard drugs and was connected to family structure. Intact families ranked higher on father closeness than single-parent families.
Source: National Fatherhood Initiative. "Family Structure, Father Closeness, & Drug Abuse." Gaithersburg, MD: National Fatherhood Initiative, 2004: 20-22.

Of the 228 students studied, those from single-parent families reported higher rates of drinking and smoking as well as higher scores on delinquency and aggression tests when compared to boys from two-parent households.
Source: Griffin, Kenneth W., Gilbert J. Botvin, Lawrence M. Scheier, Tracy Diaz and Nicole L. Miller. "Parenting Practices as Predictors of Substance Use, Delinquency, and Aggression Among Urban Minority Youth: Moderating Effects of Family Structure and Gender." Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 14 (June 2000): 174-184.

Father Factor in Childhood Obesity

The National Longitudinal Survey of Youth found that obese children are more likely to live in father-absent homes than are non-obese children.
Source: National Longitudinal Survey of Youth

Study that looked at family lifestyle and parent's Body Mass Index (BMI) over a nine year period found:
Father's Body Mass Index (BMI) predicts son's and daughter's BMI independent of offspring's alcohol intake, smoking, physical fitness, and father's education
Furthermore, BMI in sons and daughters consistently higher when fathers were overweight or obese
Physical fitness of daughters negatively related to their father's obesity
Obesity of fathers associated with a four-fold increase in the risk of obesity of sons and daughters at age 18
Source: Burke V, Beilin LJ, Dunbar D. "Family lifestyle and parental body mass index as predictors of body mass index in Australian children: a longitudinal study." Department of Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, and the Western Australian Heart Research Institute; Perth, Australia.

A fathers' body mass index (a measurement of the relative composition of fat and muscle mass in the human body) is directly related to a child's activity level. In a study of 259 toddlers, more active children were more likely to have a father with a lower BMI than less active children.
Source: Finn, Kevin, Neil Johannsen, and Bonny Specker. "Factors associated with physical activity in preschool children." The Journal of Pediatrics 140 (January 2002): 81-85.

A study that looked at dietary intake and physical activity of parents and their daughters over a two year period found:
Daughter's BMI predicted by father's diets and father's enjoyment of physical activity
As father's BMI rose, so did their daughter's BMI
Source: Davison KK, Birch LL. "Child and parent characteristics as predictors of change in girls' body mass index." Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.

Study that looked at the relationship between parent's total and percentage body fat and daughter's total body fat over a two and one-half year period found:
Father's, not mother's, total and percentage body fat the best predictor of changes in daughter's total and percentage body fat.
Source: Figueroa-Colon R, Arani RB, Goran MI, Weinsier RL. "Paternal body fat is a longitudinal predictor of changes in body fat in premenarcheal girls." Department of Pediatrics, General Clinical Research Center, Medical Statistics Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

Two studies that have looked at the determinants of physical activity in obese and non-obese children found:
Obese children less likely to report that their father's were physically active than were the children of non-obese children. This determinant not found for mothers.
Father's inactivity strong predictor of children's inactivity.
Source: Trost SG, Kerr LM, Ward DS, Pate RR. "Physical activity and determinants of physical activity in obese and non-obese children. School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Source: Fogelholm M, Nuutinen O, Pasanen M, Myohanen E, Saatela T. "Parent-child relationship of physical activity patterns and obesity." University of Helsinki, Lahti Research and Training Centre, Finland.

Children who lived with single mothers were significantly more likely to become obese by a 6-year follow-up, as were black children, children with nonworking parents, children with nonprofessional parents, and children whose mothers did not complete high school.
Source: Strauss RS, Knight J. "Influence of the home environment on the development of obesity in children." Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA.

Father Factor in Education

Fatherless children are twice as likely to drop out of school.
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics. Survey on Child Health. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1993.

Father involvement in schools is associated with the higher likelihood of a student getting mostly A's. This was true for fathers in biological parent families, for stepfathers, and for fathers heading single-parent families.
Source: Nord, Christine Winquist, and Jerry West. Fathers' and Mothers' Involvement in Their Children's Schools by Family Type and Resident Status. (NCES 2001-032). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2001.

Students living in father-absent homes are twice as likely to repeat a grade in school; 10 percent of children living with both parents have ever repeated a grade, compared to 20 percent of children in stepfather families and 18 percent in mother-only families.
Source: Nord, Christine Winquist, and Jerry West. Fathers' and Mothers' Involvement in Their Children's Schools by Family Type and Resident Status. (NCES 2001-032). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2001.

Students in single-parent families or stepfamilies are significantly less likely than students living in intact families to have parents involved in their schools. About half of students living in single-parent families or stepfamilies have parents who are highly involved, while 62 percent of students living with both their parents have parents who are highly involved in their schools.
Source: Nord, Christine Winquist, and Jerry West. Fathers' and Mothers' Involvement in Their Children's Schools by Family Type and Resident Status. (NCES 2001-032). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2001.

In 2001, 61 percent of 3- to 5-year olds living with two parents were read aloud to everyday by a family member, compared to 48% of children living in single- or no-parent families.
Source: Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2002. Table ED1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003.

Kindergarteners who live with single-parents are over-represented in those lagging in health, social and emotional, and cognitive outcomes. Thirty-three percent of children who were behind in all three areas were living with single parents while only 22% were not lagging behind.
Source: Wertheimer, Richard and Tara Croan, et al. Attending Kindergarten and Already Behind: A Statistical Portrait of Vulnerable Young Children. Child Trends Research Brief. Publication #2003-20. Washington, DC: Child Trends, 2003.

In two-parent families, children under the age of 13 spend an average of 1.77 hours engaged in activities with their fathers and 2.35 hours doing so with their mothers on a daily basis in 1997. Children in single parent families spent on .42 hours with their fathers and 1.26 hours with their mothers on daily basis.
Source: Lippman, Laura, et al. Indicators of Child, Family, and Community Connections. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2004.

A study of 1330 children from the PSID showed that fathers who are involved on a personal level with their child schooling increases the likelihood of their child's achievement. When fathers assume a positive role in their child's education, students feel a positive impact.
Source: McBride, Brent A., Sarah K. Schoppe-Sullivan, and Moon-Ho Ho. "The mediating role of fathers' school involvement on student achievement." Applied Developmental Psychology 26 (2005): 201-216.

Half of all children with highly involved fathers in two-parent families reported getting mostly A's through 12th grade, compared to 35.2% of children of nonresident father families.
Source: National Center for Education Statistics. The Condition of Education. NCES 1999022. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education, 1999: 76.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Equality 4 Fathers International" group.
To post to this group, send email to Equality-4-Fathers-International@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to Equality-4-Fathers-International-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Equality-4-Fathers-International

Monday, 14 March 2011

Just out of a meeting with Justice Minister David Forde

http://twitpic.com/49gzc2


Sent from my iPhone

Fwd: [E4F_International nr.11789] Model concerned parent letter on PAS in the DSM written by mother Monika Logan to Daniel Pine, chairman of the Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence Work Group of the DSM



Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Vaderkenniscentrum|SKO <vaderkenniscentrum@gmail.com>
Date: 14 March 2011 04:19:02 GMT
To: Familyrights 4 Europe Yahoo <fr4e@yahoogroups.com>,  Equality-4-Fathers-International <Equality-4-Fathers-International@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [E4F_International nr.11789] Model concerned parent letter on PAS in the DSM written by mother Monika Logan to Daniel Pine, chairman of the Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence Work Group of the DSM
Reply-To: equality-4-fathers-international@googlegroups.com

Model letter on PAS in the DSM written by parent Monika Littau Logan to Daniel Pine, M.D., chairman of the Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence Work Group of the DSM
------------------- 

Parent's Perspective : Proposal that Parental Alienation Disorder be included in the DSM-V. The Extreme End of the Continuum by Monika Logan, LBSW
 
To: Daniel Pine, M.D.; Chairman of the Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence Work Group, for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition;
National Institute of Mental Health

 
I have serious concerns regarding the lack of treatment and acknowledgement of Parental Alienation Disorder (PAD). As a parent, I sought counseling for my children after a vitriolic divorce. To my dismay, when I reported the cluster of symptoms, I discovered that counselors could not help. Later, I realized that the symptoms are Gardner's criteria for Parental Alienation Syndrome. In continuing my search, which lasted from 1995 to 2007, my children were constantly and perpetually diagnosed with adjustment disorder. I am also a helping professional and am alarmed at the lack of treatment options. PAS is clearly emotional abuse.
 
There are apprehensions that categorizing PAD as a mental disorder of a child pathologizes a child's reaction to a bitter divorce. Obviously, it is ideal that parents would not attempt to alienate their child from his or her other parent. The fact is some parents do and will continue to do so. It is also commonsensical that the parent participating in the alienation needs intervention. Yet, this is not practical. Intervention will remain only educational at best. Additionally, the intervention is effective if the parent that is participating realizes and cares that he or she has a problem. I am a trained facilitator for a divorce education program, titled, Children in the Middle, created by the Center for Divorce Education. Courts can continue to order parenting classes, but they cannot enforce that the parent stop badmouthing out of the court room setting. What is possible is that therapists can work with children that are aligned with one parent and work with children who unjustly and continually reject the other parent.
 
I agree with Bernet's (2008) suggested criteria. As a parent, the disturbance lasted more than two months post divorce. The disturbance, as in many cases, lasted not in months but for years. Some groups propose that awarding joint custody would abolish PAS. Yet, courts today frequently award joint custody. Conversely, awarding joint custody still does not eradicate PAD, "While shared parenting seems like a reasonable and laudable goal for most divorcing families, it is based on the premise that parents will cooperate in parenting their children" (Turkat, 2002). Turkat also points out that "many couples file for divorce because they have an extensive history of being unable to get along with each other—to now expect cooperation merely because they have divorced may be too optimistic." Adding PAD to the DSM is the first step for recognition and future treatment options.
 
Professionals are concerned regarding treatment because the etiology of PAD is debated and deemed unknown. I agree with Warshak (2002) that, "when there is no brainwashing parent there is no PAS." Nevertheless, to my understanding, not all diagnoses listed by the American Psychiatric Association include definitive statements about causes, prognosis, incidence or treatment. According to Gardner, Sauber, and Lorandos (2006), "The professional community ordinarily regards the presentation of a new diagnostic term based on clinical observations as just the beginning of work in the area" (p.556, ¶ 5).
 
There are educational benefits to understanding family dynamics as it relates to PAS. However, it is futile to point out that children may become alienated from their parents for reasons other than PAS, such as physical or sexual abuse. It is common knowledge that children whose parents have abused them will reject the parent that abused them, and as consequence, alienation many occur. However, in PAS, physical, verbal, and sexual abuses are absent. In in the case of PAS the child's rejection of his or her parent is not justified. The parent is hated without good cause. I acknowledge that PAS is often associated with negative connotations. Some have used it in court as so-called proof when the parent was actually abusive. Unquestionably, PAS has been exploited by the media, extremist groups, and in the court room. Consequently, PAS has been re-named and reformulated. Kelly and Johnston (2001) provide a reformulation. The continuum concept is that divorcing couples that are at the amicable end of the continuum has a child that shows equal preference for both parents. However, I suspect that most parents writing this committee do not fall into this polarized end of the continuum. Clearly, this end of the continuum is ideal but parents requesting inclusion and seeking therapeutic intervention are not working with an ex-spouse that desires cordial co-parenting. They may instead, be faced with a child that has suddenly turned against them. A child that shows equal preference for both parents does not reflect dysfunction. Kelly & Johnston (2001) pathological alienation is equivalent to Gardner's, PAS.
 
Obviously, children will show affinity towards one parent. They may do so at different developmental stages or other reasons, such as common interest and will prefer one parent over another. This is normal. However, out right rejection of a parent for frivolous reasons is not. I and many others that are writing the committee are referring to the polarized end, not amicable post divorce relations .Without a doubt realistic estrangement occurs, but the point is it is realistic. A child who rejects his or her parent and does so do to actual abuse has good reason for the rejection. Sure, there are multiple causes for a child to reject contact with a parent; many reasons that are logical reasons. As a caveat, there are also reasons, such as PAS when a child rejects a good loving parent that does not warrant the rejection. A child who rejects his or her parent because of abuse and neglect does belong in requests for inclusion or discussion of PAS. Currently, the DSM-IV-TR recognizes abuse and neglect, which are realistic reasons for alienation, but it does not recognize irrational alienation.
 
I acknowledge the misuse of PAS. Yet, without a doubt, it is similar to other DSM-IV-TR categories: it has a set of symptoms. The symptoms of PAS should no longer be ignored. I propose that terms such as alienated child are vague; PAD is specific. One study by Gordon, Stoffey and Bottinelli (2008), had results of their study showing strong support for Gardner's definition of PAS. Please help children and families by inclusion. Inclusion would allow clinician's treatment options and provide additional research. "This proposal should not be rejected simply because there is no consensus among mental health professionals as to the pathogenesis of PAD. The history of psychology and psychiatry is full of disagreement over causation" (Bernet, 2008). This is true for most disorders unless they are organic. I also work with individuals living with autism. Not all psychologists agree on the cause or if there is a cause. However, if one is diagnosed with autism, there are treatment options. Sadly, a loving parent that desires optimal mental health for his her child, post divorce will not be offered help. They will call therapist after therapist only to be told that PAS is not real, it is a hypothesis, and PAS does not exist because it is not in the DSM. "Denial of PAS has caused significant psychological suffering to many men, many women, and many children. And its denial has only added to the burden of families in which this disorder has been present" (Gardner, 2002).
 
References
·         Bernet, W. (2008). Parental Alienation Disorder and DSM-V. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36:349-366.
·         Bottinelli, J., Gordon, R., J. & Stoffey, R. (2008). MMPI-2 Findings of Primitive Defenses in Alienating Parents. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36:211-228.
·         Gardner, R., Lorandos, D., & Sauber, R. (2006). The International Handbook of Parental Alienation Syndrome, conceptual, clinical and legal considerations. American Series in Behavioral Science and Law. Thomas Books: United States.
·         Kelly, J.B., & Johnston, J.R. (2001). The alienated child: A reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Family court Review, 39(3), 249-265.
·         Turkat, I. (2002). Shared Parenting Dysfunction. Journal of Family Therapy, 30: 385-393.
·         Warshak, R.A. (2002). Divorce Poison: Protecting the parent-child bond from a vindictive ex. New York: Regan Books.
 
 
"At the extreme end of the continuum are children who are fully alienated from a parent after separation and divorce, who express their rejection of that parent stridently, without apparent ambivalence or guilt and strongly resist or completely refuse any contact with that rejected parent. For the most part, these rejected parents fall within the broad range of marginal to good enough to sometimes better parents, who do not have a history of physical or emotional abuse of the child. Although there many be some kernel of truth to the child's complains and allegations about the rejected parent, the child's grossly negative views and feelings are significantly distorted and exaggerated reactions. Thus, this unusual development is a pathological response. It is a severe distortion on the child's parent of the previous parent-child relationship. These youngsters go far beyond an alignment in the intensity, breadth, and ferocity of their behaviors toward the parent they are rejecting." ( Johnston, 2001)
--
Drs. Peter Tromp
voorzitter

Vaderkenniscentrum|SKO
Jacob Cabeliaustraat 17
3554 VH Utrecht
t. 030.2383636
e. vaderkenniscentrum@gmail.com
i. www.vaderkenniscentrum.nl
i. www.vaderdagtrofee.nl
---
Symposium Vaderschap en uitreiking Vaderdagtrofee m/v 2011:
Op vrijdag 17 juni 2011 zal op het jaarlijkse Symposium Vaderschap van Vaderkenniscentrum.nl in samenwerking met de Universiteit van Amsterdam en IkVader weer de winnaar van de Vaderdagtrofee m/v 2011 bekend worden gemaakt. In 2010 werd de trofee gezamenlijk gewonnen door Orville Breeveld en Glenn Helberg voor hun initiatieven voor Surinaamse en Antilliaanse vaders (Vitamine Vader, Voorstel Vaderschapswet). Symposium en uitreiking waren een groot succes. Zie verder ook http://www.vaderdagtrofee.nl.

Meer inlichtingen over de Vaderdagtrofee m/v en het Symposium Vaderschap bij Peter Tromp (t. 030.2383636, Email).

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Equality 4 Fathers International" group.
To post to this group, send email to Equality-4-Fathers-International@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to Equality-4-Fathers-International-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Equality-4-Fathers-International

Fwd: [E4F_International nr.11790] Washington Post - PAS and DSM - Psychiatric experts assess parental alienation



Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Vaderkenniscentrum|SKO <vaderkenniscentrum@gmail.com>
Date: 14 March 2011 04:43:18 GMT
To: Familyrights 4 Europe Yahoo <fr4e@yahoogroups.com>,  Equality-4-Fathers-International <Equality-4-Fathers-International@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [E4F_International nr.11790] Washington Post - PAS and DSM - Psychiatric experts assess parental alienation
Reply-To: equality-4-fathers-international@googlegroups.com

Psychiatric experts assess parental alienation
Washington Times - Associated Press - By DAVID CRARY - 6 Comments and 0 Reactions - 12:55 p.m., Friday, October 1, 2010
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/oct/1/psychiatric-experts-assess-parental-alienation/
 
NEW YORK (AP) - The American Psychiatric Association has a hot potato on its hands as it updates its catalog of mental disorders _ whether to include parental alienation, a disputed term conveying how a child's relationship with one estranged parent can be poisoned by the other.
 
There's broad agreement that this sometimes occurs, usually triggered by a divorce and child-custody dispute. But there's bitter debate over whether the phenomenon should be formally classified as a mental health syndrome _ a question now before the psychiatric association as it prepares the first complete revision since 1994 of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
 
"We're gotten an enormous amount of mail _ more than any other issue," said Dr. Darrel Regier, vice chair of the task force drafting the manual. "The passions on both sides of this are exceptional."
 
On one side of the debate, which has raged since the 1980s, are feminists, advocates for battered women and others who consider "parental alienation syndrome" to be an unproven and potentially dangerous concept useful to men trying to deflect attention from their abusive behavior.
 
"This is a fabricated notion _ there's no science to support it," said Joan Meier, a professor at the George Washington University Law School who has written extensively on domestic violence and child custody.
 
On the other side are legions of firm believers in the existence of a syndrome, including hundreds gathering for a conference on the topic this weekend in New York. They say that recognition of parental alienation in the psychiatrists' manual would lead to fairer outcomes in family courts and enable more children of divorce to get treatment so they could reconcile with an estranged parent.
 
"This is a problem that causes horrible outcomes for children. … All the arguments I've heard against it are trivial," said Dr. William Bernet, a psychiatry professor at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.
 
Bernet is among the speakers at this weekend's conference, which organizers bill as the largest ever on parental alienation. He will be describing his efforts as lead author of the proposal submitted to the psychiatric association to recognize parental alienation either as a "mental disorder" or a "relational problem."
 
The psychiatric association first published its manual of diagnostic disorders, known as the DSM, in 1952. The last major revision was published in 1994 and updated in 2000, and the fifth edition _ DSM-5 _ is due for publication in May 2013.
 
Work groups in various fields have been reviewing numerous proposals for additions to the 283 disorders in the current edition. Parental alienation remains on a list of proposals that are subject to further review, though it did not pass muster with the work group dealing with childhood and adolescent disorders.
 
"There is not sufficient scientific evidence to warrant its inclusion in the DSM," Regier said in a statement.
 
In an interview, Regier _ who directs the APA's research division _ said the proposal technically remains alive pending final presentations by the end of 2011. But he described chances for inclusion of parental alienation as "slim" _ given that it has not been selected for field trials that normally would be a prerequisite for official recognition.
 
Bernet said it was "flatly ridiculous" for the APA to contend there is not enough information available to warrant including parental alienation in the DSM. He cited legal developments and new research in numerous foreign countries.
 
His proposal defines parental alienation disorder as "a mental condition in which a child, usually one whose parents are engaged in a high conflict divorce, allies himself or herself strongly with one parent, and rejects a relationship with the other parent, without legitimate justification."
 
The weekend conference at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine is the brainchild of Joseph Goldberg, who is based near Toronto and in 2008 founded an organization called the Canadian Symposium for Parental Alienation Syndrome.
 
Goldberg runs a consulting service for lawyers and parents litigating issues related to parental alienation. In his online biography, he says he "fought one of the most brutal case of parental alienation in Palm Beach County history" during a child-custody dispute with his ex-wife in Florida that extended from 2003 to 2006.
 
"This touches lives of more people than anyone imagines," Goldberg said by telephone from Canada. "It's not just about a child turned against a parent, through hatred. This affects grandparents, aunts and uncles, cousins, friends _ all of them thrown out when a child rejects a parent."
 
Some of Goldberg's allies doubt the psychiatric association is ready to include parental alienation in its manual. New York-based psychologist Amy Baker, who has written a book about parental alienation, suggested the association might "play it safe" and decline to recognize it for fear of provoking feminist groups.
 
However, Goldberg is hopeful.
 
"There's a long way to go over the next few years before they make a final decision," he said. "There will be enormous pressure. …I think it will be difficult for the APA not to include it."
 
Parental alienation surged onto the pop-culture radar screen a few years ago as a consequence of the bitter divorce and child custody battle involving actors Alec Baldwin and Kim Basinger. Baldwin was harshly criticized by some feminist groups for citing parental alienation syndrome as a source of his estrangement with his daughter.
 
The concept is a source of confusion and division in the legal profession, as some lawyers try to evoke parental alienation and others challenge that tactic.
 
Texas Supreme Court Justice Debra Lerhmann, chair of the American Bar Association's family law section, said the issue of possible alienation can be raised in child custody proceedings whether or not any such phenomenon is classified as a disorder by health professionals.
 
"Anyone who's in this business knows there are situations where that in fact is happening _ and sometimes it's alleged but is not happening," she said. "Even if it's not in the manual, relevant evidence can still be brought in."
 
Meier, the George Washington law professor, has urged judges to be cautious in how they allow the topic to be raised in cases where one estranged parent is accused by the other of abuse.
 
"You've got to assess the abuse first, without poisoning it with a claim of alienation," Meier said. "Only after abuse is ruled out do you then move on to the question of alienation."
 
Elizabeth Kates, a Pompano Beach, Fla., lawyer who deals often with child custody cases, is skeptical of the role parental alienation can play in such disputes: "It's a very easy claim to make … but the problem arises when it's used in court to obscure the investigation of whether there's been abuse."
 
She said the initial impetus for recognition of parental alienation syndrome came in large part from the fathers' rights movement, but suggested much of the momentum now comes from psychologists, consultants and others who could profit if the concept had a more formal status in family court disputes.
 
"It's monetary," Kates said. "These psychologists and therapists make huge money doing the evaluations and therapies."
 
Online:
·         Symposium on Parental Alienation Syndrome: http://www.cspas.ca/
·         Critique of PAS: http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/faq.htm
·         American Psychiatric Assn.: http://www.psych.org/MainMenu/Research/DSMIV.aspx
 
6 comments
 
Anonymous
My family has watched while our two grandchildren have been abused by an alienating mother for over 10 years. You do not know what the hell you are talking about when you say that Parental Alienation is not a reality. You should be imprisoned for condoning a horrific form of emotional and psychological child abuse. The doctor that " grew" the idea of Parental Alienation was only one person. You find child sexual abuse to be horrible but to abuse a child by psychological brainwashing, mind contol and teaching hatered is just fine with you. If you did your homework you would know that there have been numerous scientific studies not only in the US but WORLD WIDE that prove that Parental Alienation is a reality for millions of innocent children. It also proves the horrible life that you and others who lack sufficent intelligence have sentenced these children to. I guess if it does not happen to your children or grandchildren you can't acknowledge that it exists. CHILDREN DESERVE TO BE LOVED BY BOTH PARENTS AND PARENTAL ALIENATIION IS THE ULTIMATE HATE CRIME! IF THE APA DOES NOT INCULDE THIS AS A MENTAL DISORDER THEY TOO SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR CONDONING A FORM OF CHILD ABUSE THAT IS NOT VISABLE TO THE NAKED EYE. The distruction that this disorder does to the adult lives of these children is beyond measure and many of them NEVER recover from the abuse! You are sick!!!
 
Anonymous
In my many years of experience in the Children's and Family Courts in several countries, it is far more common to find Parental Self-Induced Alienation Disorder. This is where a parent is emotionally indifferent to a child or has abused a child or for numerous other reasons a parent has not formed a meaningful relationship with a child. The child may naturally have rejected that parent in response to the parent rejecting the child by his/her attittudes and behaviour. It frequently occurs that such parents are unable to accept or even acknowledge the child's rejection of him/her and consequently blames the other parent for the child's rejection and that the other parent is `alienating' the child from him/her. This is highly common in Family Law proceedings and many of my professional colleagues in the child protection professional community have commented on similar observations .
If the APA were to recognise PAS then they must at the same time also recognise Parental Self-Induced Alienation Disorder/Syndrome.
 
Anonymous
From Australia, www.safety4parentsandkids.org,
PAS is a bogus and has been used by the legal industry as a defence to depreciate motherhood in children's lives, and is an attack on women and kids...
Psychiatrists are going to spread their revenue net, to rip more and more people off if PAS is included in the DSM5, and more and more children will be exposed to more and more trauma.
PAS created by Richard Gardener, has been used to abuse women, and also promotes poedophilia, if you look at Gardener's history, he himself could be considered mad as he stabbed himself to death...
Children need freedom from being abused in Family justice systems, and there is enough research tos upport this, motherhood is non-neogtiable, as fatherhood is important to them. However, because of PAS, which is not recognised as a medical term, and not being evidenced as a disease, should never be classified as a disease, as it diverts attention from domestic violence and child abuse.
Children suffer lifelong impact of family court proceedings, and a fresh mindset is needed and a shift in paradigm as to how to manage separations safely for children. Poedophilia is unacceptable, and Gardener also supported this, but he himself was mad, by stabbing himself to death.
It will only make lawyers, courts, corrupt report writers even more wealthy. No parents should allow PAS to be accepted.
 
Anonymous
From Australia, www.safety4parentsandkids.org
PAS is a bogus and has been used by the legal industry as a defence to depreciate motherhood in children's lives, and is an attack on women and kids...
Psychiatrists are going to spread their revenue net, to rip more and more people off if PAS is included in the DSM5, and more and more children will be exposed to more and more trauma.
PAS created by Richard Gardener, has been used to abuse women, and also promotes poedophilia, if you look at Gardener's history, he himself could be considered mad as he stabbed himself to death...
Children need freedom from being abused in Family justice systems, and there is enough research tos upport this, motherhood is non-neogtiable, as fatherhood is important to them. However, because of PAS, which is not recognised as a medical term, and not being evidenced as a disease, should never be classified as a disease, as it diverts attention from domestic violence and child abuse.
Children suffer lifelong impact of family court proceedings, and a fresh mindset is needed and a shift in paradigm as to how to manage separations safely for children. Poedophilia is unacceptable, and Gardener also supported this, but he himself was mad, by stabbing himself to death.
It will only make lawyers, courts, corrupt report writers even more wealthy. No parents should allow PAS to be accepted.
 
Anonymous
In biomedecine research and development, when an "acceptable " level of maiming and death has been passed, the medecine is recalled/questioned. In psychology-(and these are psychologists, not psychiatrists), there is a lack of scientific research and control.The field is rife with ideas and theories. Alienation type theories grew from the mind of a pro-pedophile psychologist. For a theory to so objectify and dehumanize children for the sake of "proving" some idea, is reprehensible behaviour. That is possibly why this continent will never reach an unacceptable number of maimings and deaths of children. To treat developing children as products, is despicable. Theory didn't work on that one ? Child died ? Oh well- throw that one out in the garbage and don't let the media know.Is this behaviour what the APA would even consider endorsing? These theories are maiming and leading to the deaths of children.Crimes should be treated as crimes and these cases should never even reach a divorce court. Abuse a child = automatic divorce.But that would be logical, sane and humane and so may never happen.
 
--
Drs. Peter Tromp
voorzitter

Vaderkenniscentrum|SKO
Jacob Cabeliaustraat 17
3554 VH Utrecht
t. 030.2383636
e. vaderkenniscentrum@gmail.com
i. www.vaderkenniscentrum.nl
i. www.vaderdagtrofee.nl
---
Symposium Vaderschap en uitreiking Vaderdagtrofee m/v 2011:
Op vrijdag 17 juni 2011 zal op het jaarlijkse Symposium Vaderschap van Vaderkenniscentrum.nl in samenwerking met de Universiteit van Amsterdam en IkVader weer de winnaar van de Vaderdagtrofee m/v 2011 bekend worden gemaakt. In 2010 werd de trofee gezamenlijk gewonnen door Orville Breeveld en Glenn Helberg voor hun initiatieven voor Surinaamse en Antilliaanse vaders (Vitamine Vader, Voorstel Vaderschapswet). Symposium en uitreiking waren een groot succes. Zie verder ook http://www.vaderdagtrofee.nl.

Meer inlichtingen over de Vaderdagtrofee m/v en het Symposium Vaderschap bij Peter Tromp (t. 030.2383636, Email).

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Equality 4 Fathers International" group.
To post to this group, send email to Equality-4-Fathers-International@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to Equality-4-Fathers-International-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Equality-4-Fathers-International

Thursday, 3 March 2011

Overall Suicide Rate Rising In Northern Ireland: Suicides increasing in young men and decreasing in women

Overall Suicide Rate Rising In Northern Ireland: Suicides increasing in young men and decreasing in women

Embargoed until 20 June 2007

The overall rate of suicide in Northern Ireland appears to be rising, a new study has found. However, whilst suicides are increasing substantially in young men, they are decreasing in women.



It is widely acknowledged that official mortality statistics underestimate the true extent of suicide, and accurate yearly figures are notoriously difficult to assess.



This study analysed annual figures collected by the Samaritans from the ‘Unofficial Registrar General’s’ figures for the years 1984-2002. Trends by sex, age group, marital status and method were examined.



The average annual rate of suicide was calculated for the 10-year period 1984-1993, and compared with the 9-year period 1994-2002.



It was found that the average annual rate of suicide increased by 4.7%. Female suicides decreased by 17%, but the average annual rate of male suicides increased by 13.2%.



The highest percentage increase was seen in males aged 25-34 (34%), followed by the 15-24 age group (26.5%).



The greatest increase in the average annual rate was seen among single people – amongst males it was 24.2%, and females 28.6%.



There was a decrease in the average annual rate for all methods of suicide except hanging, where there was an increase of 99.4% in males and 87.8% in females.



The researchers conclude that the rising trend in suicides in Northern Ireland is largely the result of the increase in suicides amongst young males aged 15-34. The rate of female suicides appears to be falling.



The increase in the violent suicide method of hanging suggests that this more lethal way of attempting to kill oneself is contributing to the higher suicide rate.

Suicides

Suicides
Small decrease in 2009


Suicide rates by sex, United Kingdom, 1991-2009


Between 1991 and 2009 the number of suicides in people aged 15 years and over in the UK gradually decreased. Despite a sharp increase of 538 from 1997 to 1998, figures continued to fall until 2007. Suicides increased in 2008 to 5,706 but fell by 31 in 2009 to 5,675.

There are more suicides among men than women. Male suicide rates peaked at 21.1 per 100,000 in 1992 and 1998 and then continually declined to 16.8 per 100,000 in 2007. The rate increased in 2008 to 17.7 per 100,000 and remained similar in 2009 at 17.5 per 100,000.

Suicide rates for women have been consistently much lower than rates for men and have shown a steady downward trend. The rate was highest in 1991 and 1992 at 6.7 per 100,000 and was lowest in 2007 at 5.0 per 100,000. In 2008 the rate increased to 5.4 per 100,000 and was similar in 2009 at 5.2 per 100,000.




Suicide rates by sex and age-group, United Kingdom, 1991-2009

In the early 1990s the highest suicide rates in the UK were among men aged 75 years and over. Rates for this age group have since decreased, falling from 25.1 per 100,000 in 1991 to 13.6 per 100,000 in 2009, now the lowest rate across the three male age bands. Since 1997 the highest rates have been in men aged 15–44, peaking in 1998 at 24.0 per 100,000 and then steadily decreasing to 17.6 per 100,000 in 2007. The rate for this age group increased to 18.6 per 100,000 in 2008 but decreased to 18.0 per 100,000 in 2009. Suicide rates among men aged 45–74 have fluctuated less throughout the period. In 2009 the rate for this group was 17.4 per 100,000.

Women aged 75 years and over show a similar trend to men in the same age group. The highest rate for this group over the period was 9.4 per 100,000 in 1993. The rate in 2009 halved to 4.7 per 100,000. Since 2005 the highest suicide rates among women have been in those aged 45–74. In 2009 the rate for this group was 5.8 per 100,000. Suicide rates in women aged 15–44 were consistently the lowest across the 1991-2007 period. In 2008 and 2009 the rate for this group was 4.9 per 100,000.




Source: Office for National Statistics, General Register Office for Scotland, Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency.

Notes:

Suicide has been defined as deaths given an underlying cause of intentional self-harm or injury/poisoning of undetermined intent. In England and Wales, it has been customary to assume that most injuries and poisonings of undetermined intent are cases where the harm was self-inflicted but there was insufficient evidence to prove that the deceased deliberately intended to kill themselves. For comparability, this definition has been used across all countries of the UK.

Figures are for adults aged 15 years and over.

Figures are based on deaths registered in each calendar year.

Rates are directly age-standardised using the European Standard Population.

Rates for 2002 to 2008 have been revised due to revisions in the mid-year population estimates (published by ONS on 13 May 2010).




Published on 27 January 2011 at 9:30 am

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

Irish Parenting Site for Dads and Dads-to-be

Irish Parenting Site for Dads and Dads-to-be

Reasons and Methods for Direct Action

Below is a general good read for those needing to understand some of the reasons and methods for Direct Action and pressure groups vs political lobbying approaches.

As you read this, please consider that since the demise of F4J (which tried to be a jack of all trades "insider" & "outsider", and failed) there have been at least two new political parties formed supporting the agenda of co-parenting and family law reforms. Therefore, don't get confused by thinking that Real FFJ is anywhere near being an "insider" and that is best left to dedicated moderates who can ride on the back of "external" pressure from the likes of RFFJ:

http://www.pressurepolitics.com/evidenc … n+business

This section looks at Direct action


[This section discusses insiders and direction action]

Groups switch strategies themselves without suffering loss of 'insider' status. To initiate a public protest against proposed changes in the law can be pursued at the same time as 'insider' strategies of arguing against them without loss of status. Government departments know and understand the aspirations of and constraints operating on group leaders and expect groups to make a loud noise on some things, and they will still invite them to participate in working groups and other participatory forums.


(Page, 1998, p. 1 1)

........

Tactics such as peaceful public demonstrations and letter writing campaigns are perfectly compatible with insider status, but more violent forms of direct action are not. It is evident that leaders of insider groups have from time to time tacitly encouraged various forms of protest by their members as a means of generating additional leverage against government in times of difficulty. However, they have always been worried about losing control of their members in such circumstances. This was evident in the mid-1970s when demonstrations by farmers against Irish beef imports led to railway lines being ripped up by 'flying pickets' of farmers and increasing anxiety among the leaders of farmers' unions that they would be accused by ministers of not being able to control their own members. These worries surfaced again in 1998 when farmers' union leaders welcomed demonstrations by members as evidence of the extent of their frustration, but became concerned when these demonstrations led to illegal acts.

The tensions of trying simultaneously to pursue an insider and an outsider strategy are well illustrated by the case of the environmental group, Greenpeace. Over the years, Greenpeace has shifted towards more dialogue with government and business while maintaining the direct action activities that attract the donations which sustain the organization. This change of approach was exemplified when Greenpeace held its first business conference in 1996. Those attending were told that the group's latest weapon was ... solutions enforcement". This meant pushing markets to adopt products that solved environmental problems' (Financial Times, 26 September 1996).

Although Greenpeace has continued to use direct action tactics, not everyone connected with the organization was happy about the shift of emphasis. As a consequence, divisions over strategy persist: 'The division in the movement between a moderate, rational campaigning approach that appeals alike to governments and to a cautious but persuadable public on the one side and the militant direct action radicalism that still attracts the pure green radicals remains unresolved' (O'Neill, 1995, p.31). As firms try to promote a 'greener' image, the executive director of Greenpeace international has lamented that it is becoming more difficult to pick 'good fights' (The Economist, 1 August 1998, p.79).

Nevertheless, Greenpeace is still perceived by decision makers as more radical than other environmental groups. It is the only one of the leading environmental organizations represented in Brussels not to have been comissioned by the European institutions for investigative work (Greenwood, 1997: p. 190). It is the only leading environmental organization that 'does not receive funding from the European Commission. This corresponds with Greenpeace's policy of maintaining political and financial independence' (Webster, 1998: p. 1 80). Yet this outsider image is at odds with adverts for senior Greenpeace staff which seek political advisers with a business or intergovernmental background to provide 'strategic direction to campaigns and interface with high-level contacts in government, international secretariats and industry'. Given such a Janus-faced profile, no wonder that stories surface from time to time of tensions within the organization, although its hierarchical character and the fact that it has 'supporters' rather than 'members' help to stifle dissent.

What is really going on is that Greenpeace is shifting towards an insider strategy, but the process is not yet complete: 'Greenpeace is turning away from confrontation and public debate as ways to influence industry and moving to "positive persuasion" of manufacturers by playing their own game' (Eden, 1996: p.49).

Greenpeace's skill at using the media by providing 'a sort of "convenience news" of pictures, imagery and story lines' (Jordan, 1998b, p-16) has helped to maintain their public image as an organization that gets things done by challenging mighty multinationals on the high seas in inflatable boats. Their short term successes such as defeating Shell over its plan to dump the Brent Spar oil platform at sea attract considerable publicity whereas their unsuccessful campaign to stop expansion of oil exploitation in the Atlantic was largely unreported. At some point, however, the declining number of supporters (2.5 million worldwide in 1998 compared with a peak of 4.1 million in 1991) will come to realize that an outsider group has completed the transformation to an insider group, that the 'lounge suits' within the organization have finally defeated the 'rubber suits'. Simultaneously pursuing an insider and outsider strategy is a transitional phase and eventually a group has to opt for predominantly one strategy or the other (usually an insider approach).

[This section discusses the role of pressure groups in democracy...]

Pressure Groups and Democracy

There is a fundamental link between the existence of pressure groups and the very survival of a system of democratic government. Freedom of association is a fundamental principle of democracy. Democracy permits the existence of groups, but it could also be argued that groups contribute to the quality of the decision-making process. Those that have axes to grind may have something to say that is relevant to the issue under consideration.

A system of representative democracy offers electors a relatively infrequent choice between alternative party programmes..........

http://www.pressurepolitics.com/evidenc … n+business


Table 7.1 A typology of direct action

Form of action: Protest marches
Legality: Usually legal
Purpose: To demonstrate to decision-makers scale of support and concern on an issue

Form of action: Boycotts
Legality: Legal
Purpose: To inflict commercial punishment on a firm

Form of action: Stunts
Legality: May be marginally
Purpose: To focus attention illegal on an issue through publicity

Form of action: Blockades, occupations, other disruption
Legality: Open to civil action, increasingly crimninalised
Purpose: Exertion of direct pressure or target to inhibit or prevent activities

Form of action: Destruction of property
Legality: Illegal
Purpose: Bringing activity to an end

Form of action: Violence against individuals
Legality: Criminal
Purpose: Punishing those individuals seen as responsible for 'immoral' acts

Total Pageviews